You have to dumpster dive the low quality curators – by either digging through their shit or by monitoring their playlist transformation and listenership engagement/audience size fluctuations over time, or you can be stupid like how I did it and waste a shit tonne of premium credits on attempting to connect with curators who were either not appropriate for my music (or vice-versa), and/or I wasn’t willing to admit that my music wasn’t completely ready yet. So you just have to find curators here with high playlist listener engagement, and send them music suited so much to their audience’s tastes that it’s presence on their playlist is an asset to their listenership.ĭeveloping regular symbiotic relationships with curators like the one I just described is a key element in finding success here on SubmitHub, and really I won’t lie, it’s not easy. Here’s the kicker: being on this curator’s playlist got my song almost 4,000 streams that month. That they re-accepted the track was not surprising, it was the amount of time it was accepted for this second time around – six months! One of my regulars among the curators who – more often than not – accept my submissions, just re-accepted a previously accepted song that I had sent them again because the song had expired the original 30 days time expired on their playlist. I have a rant about in case y’all missed it. This rant was originally shared in the artist chat room on SubmitHub basics
Tl,dr: SubmitHub is the only one worth the money, but it rarely is and you better have serious GAME.
As a 21st century music producer and recording artist, I have used all three services extensively, so here’s the scoop on all of them.
0 kommentar(er)
